Skip to main content

Head to head · Compact SUVs · 2019 · 2019 Honda CR-V vs 2019 Mazda CX-5

Both Squawk, for opposite reasons: the Honda risks a steering bill, the Mazda risks a cylinder head.

The 2019 CR-V's defining complaint is sticky, heavy steering — $1,000–$5,700 out of warranty when the gearbox needs replacing. The 2019 CX-5 is the loudest cracked-cylinder-head year, an oil-onto-exhaust fire risk that runs several thousand on the non-turbo engine — while the turbo's version of the same failure is covered under a warranty extension.

1,057 vs 260 federal complaints · 8 vs 2 recalls · 2 full reports with mechanic & forum testimony

The board

Numbers from each year’s full report
Canary status: Squawking

2019 Honda CR-V

A sensible choice — but the VIN check is non-negotiable here.

1,057

Federal complaints

8

Recall campaigns

$1,000–$5,700

Steering gearbox repair out of warranty

Canary status: Squawking

2019 Mazda CX-5

The cracked-cylinder-head year — the loudest gen-2 file, and the one where the fire-risk oil leak recurs most.

260

Federal complaints

2

Recall campaigns

$0

Turbo cracked head under extension CSP11

Two different organs, one shared rule: buy the individual car that's already proven it doesn't have the disease.

See where both rank among Compact SUVs

Where each one bites

The signature problems, with real repair money — every fact cited in the full reports.

2019 CR-V

Sticky / heavy steering

$1,000–$5,700

Steering leads recent federal filings: momentary resistance or notchiness turning off-center, especially at highway speed. Honda addressed similar symptoms on later models with bulletins and, for 2023+, a recall — for the 2019 there is no recall, so a dealer diagnosis can cost $150+ and a gearbox repair $1,000+ out of warranty. The highway test drive is your protection. Recent owner-reported dealer quotes for the full electric-power-steering gearbox assembly run $5,500–$5,700 (2026) — treat $1,000 as the floor, not the estimate.

Sources: NHTSA complaint and recall databases, 2019 CR-V · Mechanic channel and owner signal (5th-gen CR-V)

Fuel system / fuel pump

Covered

Fuel pump failure (stalling risk) is covered by recalls 21V-215/23V-858, plus a 2019-specific fuel tank weld defect (19V-569 — tank replaced free). Fuel/propulsion is the #2 complaint category, so these campaigns map to a real pattern. Verify both by VIN.

Sources: NHTSA complaint and recall databases, 2019 CR-V

Emergency braking false alarms

moderate

Phantom braking from the Honda Sensing suite remains a top complaint component this year. Include highway driver-assist behavior in the test drive.

Sources: NHTSA complaint and recall databases, 2019 CR-V

2019 CX-5

Cracked cylinder head — oil-onto-exhaust fire risk (2.5L non-turbo, uncovered)

several thousand

The signature 2019 failure and the bulk of the file. The cylinder head cracks behind the exhaust manifold; on the naturally aspirated 2.5 it leaks oil onto the hot exhaust, producing a burning smell and a fire hazard, and it recurs well under 100,000 miles. Mazda acknowledged the cracked heads and issued a revised design, but for the non-turbo engine there is no warranty extension — owners report the related program covers only coolant leaks, not the oil leak this engine produces, so out-of-warranty repairs are theirs. Inspect for oil near the exhaust and a burning smell, and get any engine-repair history in writing.

Sources: NHTSA complaint database, 2019 Mazda CX-5 · Independent mechanic and owner channel transcripts (CX-5 second generation, incl. diesel)

Turbo 2.5T cracked head — coolant leak, warranty-extended (CSP11)

$0 (if in window)

On the turbocharged 2.5T, the same cracked-head problem shows up as a coolant leak at the cylinder head around the exhaust manifold rather than an oil leak. For this version Mazda ran CSP11, a Customer Service Program that extended the limited powertrain warranty to 10 years or 120,000 miles and offered reimbursement. If you're looking at a 2.5T, this is the better-protected side of the same defect — confirm CSP11 is in the history and whether the repair was done.

Sources: NHTSA recalls + manufacturer communications (CSP11/SSPD8 windows, campaign documents) · Independent mechanic and owner channel transcripts (CX-5 second generation, incl. diesel)

PCM stall-software and low-pressure fuel-pump recalls

Covered

The 2019's two recalls: 19V497 (Mazda 3719F) reprograms the powertrain control module — the PCM, the engine computer — after a software error that can stall the engine; 21V875 (Mazda 5321K) replaces a Denso low-pressure fuel pump whose impeller can crack and cause a stall (CX-5 scope confirmed 2018–2019). Both free. Confirm each is completed by VIN.

Sources: NHTSA recalls + manufacturer communications (CSP11/SSPD8 windows, campaign documents)

The tiebreakers

How to actually decide, listing by listing.

Steering versus cylinder head

  1. CR-V: the low-speed steering test decides.

    Ten minutes of parking-lot maneuvers and lane changes reveals the sticky-steering condition; the fix spans $1,000–$5,700 once the warranty is gone. While you're there, confirm the subframe-bolt (19V-865) and 2019-specific fuel-tank-weld (19V-569) recalls by VIN.

  2. CX-5: which engine, then which paperwork.

    On the non-turbo 2.5L, look for oil seepage at the cylinder head — the owner-paid repair runs several thousand. On the 2.5T, the same crack is covered under CSP11 if the car is in the window; that coverage is worth real money.

  3. The Mazda's recall list is short and free — close it.

    The stall-software fix (19V497) and the Denso fuel-pump campaign (21V875) are both free. A 2019 with both closed and no head seepage is the quiet version of this loud year.

  4. The Honda tax nobody prices in: theft.

    This CR-V generation became a theft target. Where you park matters to your premium — ask your insurer before you ask the seller for a discount.

Not set on 2019?

The matchup flips by year. Pick a different pair of cells and the verdict changes.

One year back is the cliff on the Honda side — the 2018 CR-V Fainted at 2,072 complaints with oil dilution, while the 2018 CX-5 Squawks at 113. Forward, both 2020s Chirp: 329 and 105.

Compare any two

Any two years, side by side — the numbers line up even before we’ve written the verdict. We line up years of the same model, or two rivals from the same segment in the same year.

First vehicle
Second vehicle
Both files are loud; only one of them can set the car on fire.
The 2019 cracked-head caveat

Found one of each? Let the canary referee.

Paste either VIN and we’ll check its open recalls, campaign status, and build date against everything in these two reports — free.

Check a VIN — free