The class action is not a recall — what it actually coversmoderate
Owners run into this constantly, and one in this year's file says it out loud: 'not sure why this vehicle isn't the class action lawsuit against Subaru of America with Powell et al.' Here is the documented position. A class action was filed on behalf of Christine Powell by a Pittsburgh-based firm, originally contending that 2017 to 2019 Forester, Outback and Crosstrek windshields are defective; it was later expanded with 15 new plaintiffs to add 2020 Forester, Outback and Crosstrek and 2017 to 2020 Legacy and Impreza, and consolidated with two further cases filed in California and New Jersey. The complaint alleges the windshields spontaneously crack and that replacement windshields do not fix it, and that cracks interfere with the EyeSight collision-avoidance cameras mounted behind the glass. What the plaintiffs seek is damages and a jury trial. That is not a recall, it is not a repair programme, and it compels nothing until a court approves a settlement. Two things follow for a 2022 buyer: this model year is outside the scope reported in that litigation, and the Crosstrek's Subaru bulletin record carries no windshield warranty extension at all, while the Forester's and Outback's do. Budget for glass; do not budget on a lawsuit.
Sources: NHTSA complaint database, 2022 Subaru Crosstrek (true count 29) · NHTSA recalls database and Subaru manufacturer communications (campaign summaries and warranty-extension bulletins) · Reported coverage of the Subaru defective-windshield class action (Powell v. Subaru of America, consolidated with California and New Jersey cases)